Notepad++

First thing first. Notepad sucks. It adds zero value to (read decreases) your productivity. There is only one reason to use it… its light.

I tried couple of options available but Notepad++ wins for sure. This is open source project, straight forward and easy to use. This can do whatever a normal editor is supposed to do. Adding to that, it supports syntax highlighting and syntax folding for C, C++, Java, C#, XML, HTML, PHP, JavaScript, makefile, ASCII art, doxygen, ASP, VB/VBScript, Unix Shell Script, BAT, SQL, Objective-C, CSS, Pascal, Perl, Python, Lua, Tcl, Assembler, Ruby, Lisp, Scheme, Smalltalk, PostScript, VHDL, FORTRAN, Ada, Caml, AutoIt, KiXtart, Matlab and Verilog. Couple of these I didn’t even heard of :( .

It has rich set of features. Such as:

  • Syntax Highlighting and Syntax Folding
  • WYSIWYG
  • User Defined Syntax Highlighting
  • Auto-completion
  • Multi-Document
  • Multi-View
  • Regular Expression Search/Replace supported
  • Full Drag ‘N’ Drop supported
  • Dynamic position of Views
  • File Status Auto-detection
  • Zoom in and zoom out
  • Multi-Language environment supported
  • Bookmark
  • Brace and Indent guideline Highlighting
  • Macro recording and playback

For me, the best use is when I say “View Source” from IE. To open source in notepad++, change your default program to open text files in notepad++ using Folder Options.

I know there are are more advanced editors than this. I haven’t tried them all but most of them are kind of real resource hog or complex. If you haven’t use it, give it a try. :)

All that said doesn’t mean I am saying notepad++ is advanced editorthan Vim or Emacs. But I really can’t think of a text editor for which I have to read tutorials. Really, tutorials for using a text editor. Am I missing something?

PS: There is a basic comparison of text editors at Wikipedia. If you can spare time, try as much as editors from the list. :)

Advertisement

2 Responses to “Notepad++”

  • Neo

    Dost,

    Most of the “rich” features that you mention are general, run-of-the-mill features for Vim. Sure you have to read tutorials for it but wouldn’t you do so happily if your productivity increased by 100-200%?

    But to each, his own. Everyone has to find a text editor that is the right balance of features, complexity and resource-heaviness.

  • Anand Prakash

    Correct bro…

    but by the time I finish those tutorials, I’ll keep on using notepad++ :) ). Jokes apart, I agree Vim is a lot advanced editor but this thing is simple, straight forward and light and worked just perfect.

    I know one day I’ll be posting the same thing about Vim but with some tricks to make it simple to use.

    Till then… you know what. :)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.